Best Known (125−37, 125, s)-Nets in Base 9
(125−37, 125, 756)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 125, 756)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 19, 16)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (69, 106, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (1, 19, 16)-net over F9, using
(125−37, 125, 3691)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (88, 125, 3691)-net over F9, using
(125−37, 125, 3537605)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 125, 3537606)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 124, 3537606)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21187 163276 441421 572539 388148 254611 657505 016128 414697 633613 805854 661206 293798 984037 779828 333892 973069 968113 038560 815777 > 9124 [i]