Best Known (128−37, 128, s)-Nets in Base 9
(128−37, 128, 770)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 128, 770)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 22, 30)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (69, 106, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (4, 22, 30)-net over F9, using
(128−37, 128, 4429)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (91, 128, 4429)-net over F9, using
(128−37, 128, 5102114)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 128, 5102115)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 127, 5102115)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15 445415 459342 172738 813394 580468 395390 627733 443445 750487 875865 712855 931880 305785 482542 119182 685737 716925 606466 678494 991665 > 9127 [i]