Best Known (142−37, 142, s)-Nets in Base 9
(142−37, 142, 904)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 142, 904)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 36, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 18, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 18, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (69, 106, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 53, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (18, 36, 164)-net over F9, using
(142−37, 142, 10384)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (105, 142, 10384)-net over F9, using
(142−37, 142, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 142, large)-net in base 9, because
- 35 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 107, large)-net in base 9, but