Best Known (128−38, 128, s)-Nets in Base 9
(128−38, 128, 756)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 128, 756)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 20, 16)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (70, 108, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 54, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 54, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (1, 20, 16)-net over F9, using
(128−38, 128, 3683)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (90, 128, 3683)-net over F9, using
(128−38, 128, 2658916)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 128, 2658917)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 139 008470 922597 173529 734528 714693 973067 459147 074137 475510 771348 350974 993027 418228 622248 947165 341294 032074 352465 640438 771513 > 9128 [i]