Best Known (142−38, 142, s)-Nets in Base 9
(142−38, 142, 804)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 142, 804)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (103, 142, 804)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 32, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (71, 110, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (13, 32, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(142−38, 142, 8433)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (104, 142, 8433)-net over F9, using
(142−38, 142, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 142, large)-net in base 9, because
- 36 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 106, large)-net in base 9, but