Best Known (56, 56+40, s)-Nets in Base 9
(56, 56+40, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 96, 344)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 98, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 49, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 49, 172)-net over F81, using
(56, 56+40, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (56, 96, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 48, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
(56, 56+40, 39486)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 96, 39487)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40 494579 679306 312676 720002 013818 763590 258283 023158 821707 858428 207872 142763 449419 486764 922721 > 996 [i]