Best Known (75−43, 75, s)-Nets in Base 9
(75−43, 75, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 75, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
(75−43, 75, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(32, 75, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 50, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
(75−43, 75, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (32, 75, 120)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 75, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
(75−43, 75, 2487)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 75, 2488)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 74, 2488)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41256 851593 424562 109562 461274 691372 391318 766754 885360 862626 258199 219905 > 974 [i]