MinT - Best Known (35, 35+43, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (35, 35+43, s)-Nets in Base 9

(35, 35+43, 81)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (35, 78, 81)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 78, 81)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
    - F₄ from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F₉ [i]

(35, 35+43, 88)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive

(35, 78, 88)-net in base 9, using

base change [i] based on digital (9, 52, 88)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(35, 35+43, 128)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (35, 78, 128)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 78, 128)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(35, 35+43, 3409)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (35, 78, 3410)-net in base 9, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 77, 3410)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9^mÂ â‰¥ 30 064520 840585 561712 922731 324863 554162 825484 990385 641707 595152 818478 464849 > 9⁷⁷ [i]