Best Known (62, 62+46, s)-Nets in Base 9
(62, 62+46, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 108, 344)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (62, 110, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 55, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 55, 172)-net over F81, using
(62, 62+46, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (62, 108, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 54, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
(62, 62+46, 35644)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 108, 35645)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 440117 448666 031927 159555 330764 783872 911179 734540 148954 727297 439398 471184 026376 039094 793381 263822 082969 > 9108 [i]