Best Known (68, 68+52, s)-Nets in Base 9
(68, 68+52, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 120, 344)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 122, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 172)-net over F81, using
(68, 68+52, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (68, 120, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 60, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
(68, 68+52, 33434)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 120, 33435)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3 230518 542328 302900 881741 046688 735082 000304 196887 071883 646804 249591 604218 975964 044760 366142 591867 255520 675692 201585 > 9120 [i]