Best Known (130−57, 130, s)-Nets in Base 9
(130−57, 130, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (73, 130, 344)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (73, 132, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 172)-net over F81, using
(130−57, 130, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (73, 130, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 65, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
(130−57, 130, 35159)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (73, 130, 35160)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (73, 129, 35160)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1252 057678 840923 558939 836303 208445 182223 970926 852874 708707 578399 136541 975229 301258 711433 704094 823416 657882 896303 414659 996417 > 9129 [i]