Best Known (34, 34+58, s)-Nets in Base 9
(34, 34+58, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 92, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 92, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 34+58, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 92, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 92, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 34+58, 1535)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 92, 1536)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6189 167147 912195 663011 454902 660453 020817 805772 316040 059357 246624 104568 970419 751817 179137 > 992 [i]