Best Known (33, 33+59, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 33+59, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 92, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 92, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(33, 33+59, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 92, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(33, 33+59, 1422)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 92, 1423)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 91, 1423)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 692 615231 779167 084064 165673 868811 020556 800087 248280 718628 155443 232655 639320 508436 651417 > 991 [i]