MinT - Best Known (102−61, 102, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (102−61, 102, s)-Nets in Base 9

(102−61, 102, 81)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (41, 102, 81)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 102, 81)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
    - F₄ from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F₉ [i]

(102−61, 102, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive

(41, 102, 82)-net in base 9, using

base change [i] based on digital (7, 68, 82)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
    - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(102−61, 102, 140)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (41, 102, 140)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 102, 140)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(102−61, 102, 2438)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (41, 102, 2439)-net in base 9, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (41, 101, 2439)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9^mÂ â‰¥ 2 411613 144659 079109 347809 284066 521653 006249 785897 462555 564663 817614 459117 741492 124644 607824 905105 > 9¹⁰¹ [i]