Best Known (50, 50+61, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 50+61, 102)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 111, 102)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 33, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 78, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 33, 28)-net over F9, using
(50, 50+61, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 111, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 50+61, 4730)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 111, 4731)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 110, 4731)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 928 396704 915680 011708 961628 466529 467477 077570 400506 533676 861474 501774 779956 710738 193420 310134 113455 702737 > 9110 [i]