Best Known (59, 59+61, s)-Nets in Base 9
(59, 59+61, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 120, 128)-net over F9, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (59, 125, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 46, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 79, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 46, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(59, 59+61, 214)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (59, 120, 214)-net over F9, using
(59, 59+61, 9162)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 120, 9163)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 119, 9163)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 359814 529476 338372 370028 039800 784415 401264 429335 303661 760208 451605 201400 243575 707382 577736 038492 144175 188750 979025 > 9119 [i]