Best Known (32, 32+64, s)-Nets in Base 9
(32, 32+64, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 96, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
(32, 32+64, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (32, 96, 120)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 96, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
(32, 32+64, 1146)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 96, 1147)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 483871 879451 599195 401277 584015 615575 431884 603810 199533 046882 166304 733931 319828 563649 909505 > 996 [i]