Best Known (100−65, 100, s)-Nets in Base 9
(100−65, 100, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 100, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 100, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(100−65, 100, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 100, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 100, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(100−65, 100, 1412)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 100, 1413)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 99, 1413)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29715 221790 627143 043379 372289 995858 500737 178136 353363 679045 276468 745710 591382 758393 660627 028225 > 999 [i]