Best Known (34, 34+65, s)-Nets in Base 9
(34, 34+65, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 99, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 99, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 34+65, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 99, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 99, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 34+65, 1317)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 99, 1318)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 98, 1318)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3305 529624 376162 861269 949432 461551 230317 541805 248047 074219 755227 789807 157671 856801 388120 052225 > 998 [i]