Best Known (106−66, 106, s)-Nets in Base 9
(106−66, 106, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 106, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 106, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(106−66, 106, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 106, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 106, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(106−66, 106, 1891)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 106, 1892)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 142185 167633 905274 101671 192039 316494 096866 685581 799177 547429 154177 192207 745383 334296 389298 293951 596321 > 9106 [i]