Best Known (30, 30+67, s)-Nets in Base 9
(30, 30+67, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 97, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 97, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(30, 30+67, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (30, 97, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 97, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(30, 30+67, 962)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 97, 963)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 96, 963)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 458445 678357 704920 232241 853588 430978 624162 895077 515714 027418 063223 485540 165145 992199 420185 > 996 [i]