Best Known (99−69, 99, s)-Nets in Base 9
(99−69, 99, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 99, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 99, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(99−69, 99, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (30, 99, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 99, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(99−69, 99, 931)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 99, 932)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 98, 932)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3297 088100 480700 364362 468010 912825 835779 573514 585042 030292 614678 705455 488153 540981 575991 176385 > 998 [i]