Best Known (27, 27+69, s)-Nets in Base 9
(27, 27+69, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 96, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 96, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(27, 27+69, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (27, 96, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 96, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(27, 27+69, 764)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 96, 765)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 95, 765)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 694148 607092 138863 836699 017035 521696 478784 558397 272305 730817 289775 127862 850478 012913 824145 > 995 [i]