Best Known (106−73, 106, s)-Nets in Base 9
(106−73, 106, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 106, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 106, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(106−73, 106, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 106, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(106−73, 106, 1061)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 106, 1062)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 105, 1062)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15844 430169 611987 684158 357091 593360 797015 199828 192173 011024 908732 539354 990288 085802 723474 976289 369665 > 9105 [i]