Best Known (60, 60+73, s)-Nets in Base 9
(60, 60+73, 110)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 133, 110)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 43, 36)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 35)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 35)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 90, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (7, 43, 36)-net over F9, using
(60, 60+73, 190)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (60, 133, 190)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (60, 189)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 60 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
(60, 60+73, 5608)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 133, 5609)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 132, 5609)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 915615 606642 177428 044148 879384 337542 717051 263937 562675 487084 733925 552359 675805 292792 418754 598071 876824 610898 548893 773690 119585 > 9132 [i]