Best Known (50, 50+74, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 50+74, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 124, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 124, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(50, 50+74, 84)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(50, 124, 84)-net in base 9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (50, 126, 84)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 84, 84)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 83)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 83)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 84, 84)-net over F27, using
(50, 50+74, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 124, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 50+74, 2866)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 124, 2867)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21205 015557 877241 792916 998194 765199 525231 985466 105090 628331 412413 251044 230212 406466 181021 187861 514283 519016 523573 130745 > 9124 [i]