Best Known (86−76, 86, s)-Nets in Base 9
(86−76, 86, 40)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 86, 40)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (8, 86, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
(86−76, 86, 54)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (10, 86, 54)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 53)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 54, using
(86−76, 86, 99)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 86, 100)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (10, 85, 100)-net in base 9, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(985, 100, S9, 75), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 693 349003 011434 276309 531891 149773 253542 241992 640047 050289 802748 390016 846562 612470 179184 834411 / 376983 659851 > 985 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(985, 100, S9, 75), but