Best Known (94−83, 94, s)-Nets in Base 9
(94−83, 94, 40)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 94, 40)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (8, 94, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
(94−83, 94, 55)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (11, 94, 55)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 54)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
(94−83, 94, 105)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 94, 106)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 93, 106)-net in base 9, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(993, 106, S9, 82), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 59 420085 915766 107728 505751 844679 075927 724890 936316 820686 590430 232059 418945 034096 274957 873633 207402 099581 / 966 180894 535549 > 993 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(993, 106, S9, 82), but