Best Known (65, 65+84, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65, 65+84, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 149, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 149, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 65+84, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (65, 149, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 149, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 65+84, 4986)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 149, 4987)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15316 312893 259992 276622 843544 917349 437543 405878 369346 499888 259957 787797 304046 815392 438979 727371 225349 250245 575010 378216 026667 278722 890693 675505 > 9149 [i]