Best Known (24, 24+85, s)-Nets in Base 9
(24, 24+85, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+85, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (24, 109, 92)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 109, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+85, 561)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 109, 562)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 108, 562)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 969786 000951 683587 349463 039319 169660 112441 017648 053320 760896 017422 904778 162383 262424 171225 955682 717025 > 9108 [i]