Best Known (109−86, 109, s)-Nets in Base 9
(109−86, 109, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 109, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(109−86, 109, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 109, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(109−86, 109, 527)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 109, 528)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 105 463138 773518 648833 674869 710659 813214 172772 923124 295745 718150 601991 121621 869743 173067 186598 687802 053505 > 9109 [i]