Best Known (136−86, 136, s)-Nets in Base 9
(136−86, 136, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 136, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 136, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(136−86, 136, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 136, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(136−86, 136, 2173)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 136, 2174)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6002 026149 984884 245015 960825 970964 418769 706448 048812 051587 218565 308448 222655 941972 498875 154188 051888 253049 726539 866610 200077 728529 > 9136 [i]