Best Known (129−87, 129, s)-Nets in Base 9
(129−87, 129, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 129, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 129, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(129−87, 129, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (42, 129, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 129, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(129−87, 129, 1435)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 129, 1436)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 128, 1436)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 140 436633 813677 633761 922658 563083 889120 790018 370440 973546 773272 567528 583328 223042 742094 189117 873915 858970 789238 821745 334305 > 9128 [i]