Best Known (38, 38+87, s)-Nets in Base 9
(38, 38+87, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 38+87, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (38, 125, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 125, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 38+87, 1165)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 125, 1166)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 124, 1166)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21618 192755 115145 254361 688539 269021 923313 140034 105711 242263 870882 426691 239619 629839 471360 392002 121510 963166 922183 886481 > 9124 [i]