Best Known (26, 26+88, s)-Nets in Base 9
(26, 26+88, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(26, 26+88, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (26, 114, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
(26, 26+88, 613)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 114, 614)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 358171 201171 193933 097391 483037 088842 924496 677745 177885 374367 535100 300352 789469 402225 049136 169930 502265 539265 > 9114 [i]