Best Known (139−89, 139, s)-Nets in Base 9
(139−89, 139, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(139−89, 139, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 139, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(139−89, 139, 2094)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 139, 2095)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 138, 2095)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 486692 467838 902980 866283 593806 758111 974145 622597 812279 659634 022000 856224 896762 768301 116988 782612 009462 385910 397709 153112 139770 352801 > 9138 [i]