Best Known (35, 35+90, s)-Nets in Base 9
(35, 35+90, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 125, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+90, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 125, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 125, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+90, 958)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 125, 959)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 196626 749365 037427 237578 868339 455283 509130 153648 964368 663366 900945 413154 872371 215464 277652 739529 859260 304841 430782 751897 > 9125 [i]