Best Known (46, 46+91, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 46+91, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 137, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 137, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(46, 46+91, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 137, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 46+91, 1659)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 137, 1660)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 136, 1660)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6125 353271 892730 207439 018741 740491 057744 742277 287894 334287 331955 226762 052745 768791 478479 663525 191891 666748 469927 480231 543691 348833 > 9136 [i]