Best Known (48, 48+91, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+91, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 139, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 48+91, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 139, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 48+91, 1832)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 139, 1833)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 138, 1833)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 495029 689529 388346 557713 321079 949595 965369 374552 435262 857290 983147 926975 826396 194674 260752 051855 806680 027710 924641 425611 238414 784297 > 9138 [i]