Best Known (54, 54+92, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 54+92, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(54, 54+92, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(54, 54+92, 2375)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 146, 2376)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 175252 933356 875514 616397 878804 250161 245807 618274 438602 372508 496684 083921 702906 760107 359291 726140 359180 608200 913037 998121 544953 044708 414081 > 9146 [i]