Best Known (149−93, 149, s)-Nets in Base 9
(149−93, 149, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 149, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 149, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(149−93, 149, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (56, 149, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 149, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(149−93, 149, 2616)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 149, 2617)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 148, 2617)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1715 436522 697177 676751 719534 982653 363596 071105 066229 500102 130278 966457 684189 301414 650986 759070 333370 354390 598913 523210 460871 973404 748699 671473 > 9148 [i]