Best Known (53, 53+93, s)-Nets in Base 9
(53, 53+93, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(53, 53+93, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (53, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(53, 53+93, 2263)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 146, 2264)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 145, 2264)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 359047 794933 982434 138915 465736 904660 527237 171590 559499 595277 297475 266316 575664 518335 251703 336243 040161 752107 700191 796196 542515 415025 915777 > 9145 [i]