Best Known (146−95, 146, s)-Nets in Base 9
(146−95, 146, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 146, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(146−95, 146, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (51, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 146, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(146−95, 146, 1989)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 146, 1990)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 145, 1990)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 352284 791620 144429 844448 887044 604763 891536 915715 846790 091634 407206 334033 839362 625407 150255 180590 008246 170104 313825 897316 284970 847080 308241 > 9145 [i]