Best Known (10, 10+95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(10, 10+95, 40)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 105, 40)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (8, 105, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
(10, 10+95, 54)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (10, 105, 54)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 53)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 54, using
(10, 10+95, 96)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 105, 97)-net in base 9, because
- 18 times m-reduction [i] would yield (10, 87, 97)-net in base 9, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(987, 97, S9, 77), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 577 508372 587460 541806 827932 218426 944109 871880 135970 034666 716258 074835 618754 104688 984869 879637 / 5272 197931 > 987 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(987, 97, S9, 77), but