Best Known (33, 33+96, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 33+96, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 129, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 129, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(33, 33+96, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 129, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(33, 33+96, 830)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 129, 831)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1304 302311 249192 024168 352084 799037 799838 896341 008446 238895 141431 590962 955512 139920 061273 121916 494579 394967 362340 855589 543553 > 9129 [i]