Best Known (11, 11+98, s)-Nets in Base 9
(11, 11+98, 40)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 109, 40)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (8, 109, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
(11, 11+98, 55)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (11, 109, 55)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 54)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
(11, 11+98, 104)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 109, 105)-net in base 9, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 95, 105)-net in base 9, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(995, 105, S9, 84), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1240 505866 046627 131068 555034 347769 450501 463301 708903 427699 923262 975474 963339 381628 644774 672768 499337 / 265 061875 > 995 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(995, 105, S9, 84), but