Best Known (9, 9+98, s)-Nets in Base 9
(9, 9+98, 40)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 107, 40)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (8, 107, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
(9, 9+98, 48)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (9, 107, 48)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 47)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
(9, 9+98, 89)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 107, 90)-net in base 9, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 80, 90)-net in base 9, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(980, 90, S9, 71), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 825617 125614 748653 438025 314237 742758 149006 797066 212440 636337 770986 951542 029890 113291 / 30 000971 > 980 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(980, 90, S9, 71), but