Best Known (31, 102, s)-Nets in Base 9
(31, 102, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 102, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 102, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(31, 102, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (31, 102, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
(31, 102, 964)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 102, 965)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 101, 965)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 417142 905036 745740 576358 956010 349878 157282 822663 092994 069101 950458 931362 191394 493530 086478 787769 > 9101 [i]