Best Known (46, 102, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 102, 96)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 102, 96)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 33, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 69, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 33, 32)-net over F9, using
(46, 102, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 102, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 102, 4210)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 102, 4211)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 582410 765587 157238 156156 701816 286410 251254 712682 436667 520574 845603 263930 089120 708493 235069 734817 > 9102 [i]