Best Known (75, 102, s)-Nets in Base 9
(75, 102, 768)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (75, 102, 768)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 16, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (59, 86, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 43, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 43, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (3, 16, 28)-net over F9, using
(75, 102, 7320)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (75, 102, 7320)-net over F9, using
(75, 102, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (75, 102, large)-net in base 9, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (75, 77, large)-net in base 9, but